Showing posts with label cult. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cult. Show all posts

17 December 2020

American triumphalism and madness

 Things I wish I'd said

Seriously, what Michael Horton wrote is worthwhile reading, word for word. I was going to write a blog thanking him for his perceptions and his article. Then I said-- just copy and paste it to your followers. 

Here goes, buckle your seat belt.

The Cult of Christian Trumpism

DECEMBER 16, 2020  |  MICHAEL HORTON



On Saturday, December 12, a bizarre rally was held on the Washington Mall. Shofars were blown. A flyover from Marine One was cheered by shouts of praise to the Messiah (evidently distinguished from Jesus). My Pillow founder Mike Lindell shared prophetic visions of Donald Trump.


Beth Moore sounded the alarm, and David French offered wise analysis. Rod Dreher, who just published a book decrying left-wing totalitarianism, wrote that he “began to think that all of this is the right-wing Christian version of Critical Race Theory, and various doctrines held by the woke Left.” Dreher was struck by how enthusiastically evangelicals seemed to participate in the inter-religious festivities. An American-born Israeli man received permission from his Orthodox rabbi to break Shabbat to blow his shofar and another, red-white-and-blue-decorated “Trump Shofar.” Roman Catholic representatives invoked the Virgin Mary and the saints.

Don’t evangelicals reject worship of anyone other than the Triune God—and even the intercession of Mary and the saints?


“But maybe common love for Trump overtakes these theological convictions,” Dreher wrote. My response is: What theological convictions? Idolatry has taken precedence over theology.

At the same time, there is a theological heart to Christian Trumpism. Please note that I am not talking about voting for President Trump or one’s appraisal of the election’s outcome. Equally sincere Christians may be divided over these matters, which is why the Lord gave us Christian freedom to vote our conscience. Further, I’ve said quite a lot over the past several decades in criticism of those on the left (as well as the right) for trying to make Jesus a mascot in the culture wars. My public calling is not to bind Christian consciences to my own political positions.

Rather, as a minister of the Word, I am joining others in sounding the alarm that a line has been crossed into rank spiritual adultery.


Wakeup Call

For many of us, it’s easy to recognize the assimilation of Christian faith to cultural and political progressivism. But it’s time for all of us—finally—to take the log out of our own eye. The “Jericho March” was a blip in the news cycle, but maybe it can be a wakeup call for Christ’s body.

What we’re witnessing on the national stage right now is disgraceful. In fact, the only word for it is blasphemy—the sacrilege not of secularists marching on Washington to take away religious freedom but of evangelicals marching on Washington to perpetuate a cult. We might have ignored this as a spectacle, a performance by a handful of voices in opposition to the Constitutional system of our republic. But I feel conscience-bound as a minister of the Word to warn against what can only be considered a heresy—indeed, a cult within a certain segment of evangelicalism. It has arisen over many decades and will no doubt be around for many more to come.

While worrying about secularists outside, many of us have failed to reckon with the secularization right under our noses, as the rich cuisine of biblical faith is traded for a mess of pop-culture stew. This idolatry inhibits the church’s work of evangelism in myriad ways.


Internally, it turns the saving gospel into worldly power; externally, the hypocrisy of some evangelicals has been exposed to a cynical and watching world. “You who boast in the law dishonor God by breaking the law. For, as it is written, ‘The name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you’” (Rom. 2:23–24).

I don’t know the demographic size of this movement, but it seems to represent the confluence of three trends that have seethed independently until converging, especially in the neo-Pentecostal movement that traditionally has not been identified with evangelicalism per se. These three trends are (1) Christian Americanism, (2) end-times conspiracy, and (3) the prosperity gospel.


1. Christian Americanism

Christian Americanism is the narrative that God specially called the United States into being as an extraordinary—verging on miraculous—providence. Passages from the election of Israel in the old covenant are lifted out of context and applied to America.

The better “lights” among the founding fathers (such as James Madison) made the case for a non-sectarian Constitution—a distinction based partly on sound Christian convictions. For example, in the new covenant there is no “holy nation” in the geopolitical sense. Rather, Christ has established a universal kingdom, bringing salvation to the ends of the earth by his gospel. This kingdom consists of those gathered around “the Lamb who was slain” and “ransomed people for God from every tribe and language and people and nation” to be “a kingdom and priests to our God” (Rev. 5:9, 12).

This “good news” is not moral improvement or a Christian society or any political system—whether democratic or totalitarian, capitalist or socialist. It’s the announcement that in his incarnation, obedient life, sacrificial death, and resurrection Jesus Christ has accomplished redemption from sin, death, and hell and reconciled sinners with God.

Justification—this declaration that sinners are right with God solely on the basis of Christ’s merits—is received through faith in Christ alone, not by our works. Therefore, this saving response to Christ, which itself is a gift of God’s grace, must be offered freely, without coercion. Yet in scrambling for political privilege, the church loses confidence in the Spirit’s power working through this gospel and communicates to the world that it requires worldly supports for its success.

As the nation’s religious diversity expands, its long history of civil religion—once secured by a core of often-vague Protestantism—widens to include any and all who share the real faith of many today (on the left and the right): a political agenda. The spiritual syncretism exhibited in the Jericho March illustrates a deeper phenomenon at work in a segment of American evangelicalism.

Whatever inconsistencies have marked American religious history, the separation of church from political privilege has resulted not from a creeping humanism but from the best instincts of Bible-believing Christians. On biblical grounds alone, then, this ideal—of a “Christian nation” other than the universal church; of the gospel as a social, moral, or political agenda; and of saving faith as something that can be legislated and enforced—must be rejected.


2. End-Times Conspiracy

Growing up in conservative evangelicalism during the 1970s and ’80s, I experienced the anxiety of possibly being “left behind.” Hal Lindsey’s The Late, Great Planet Earth topped the bestseller list. Behind its science-fiction interpretation of biblical prophecy was a Manichean dualism between “the planet Earth” and “Heaven” to which the remnant of truly godly (and clued-in) believers would be raptured.

Henry Kissinger, the pope, or a Communist world leader would become the Antichrist; then the world would be annihilated in a nuclear holocaust, Armageddon. These were not possible speculations, but absolute certainties, and they were often more riveting than “Christ and him crucified” (1 Cor. 2.2)

Wedded comfortably to the John Birch Society, this rendition of the end times prepared us for the imminent rise of the Common Market countries and the consolidation of the United Nations (to undermine U.S. sovereignty). The true Christians were on earth only to witness to everyone about the coming calamity so that they, too, could be raptured. The United States was represented as Israel’s only savior.

About this time, Hal Lindsey and other non-Pentecostal end-times commentators took their shows on the road, gaining prominence on TV programs such as The PTL Club (Jim and Tammy Bakker) and Trinity Broadcasting Network (Paul and Jan Crouch). Meanwhile, Robert Schuller and his Hour of Power was uniting the “positive thinking” psychology of his mentor, Norman Vincent Peale, to the “prosperity gospel” that dominated PTL, TBN, and other neo-Pentecostal enterprises. In all this focus on Christ’s dramatic return, the finished work of Christ on the cross was eclipsed in many evangelical imaginations.


3. Prosperity Gospel

The common source of both Peale’s cult of success and the health-and-wealth gospel is the mind-science movement of the 19th century. To errors (1) and (2) above, these neo-Pentecostals contributed a hyperexperiential spirituality based on speaking in tongues and routine claims of direct revelations from God. It’s a view well exhibited by Eric Metaxas’s comment about the Jericho March founder’s vision: “When God gives you a vision, you don’t need to know anything else.”

Christians traditionally believe we should not expect God to speak outside his revealed Word, which has reached its fulfillment and therefore completion in Christ. Yes, Scripture often requires interpretation, sometimes even healthy debate, for us to agree on its meaning. However, to those who expect their self-appointed apostles to provide more scintillating and relevant wisdom than, say, Isaiah, Romans, or the Gospel of John, not even the Bible contains a sufficiently authoritative rebuke. 

If you’re already predisposed to believing whatever a ringleader says, then the assertion of divine fiat keeps you from having to argue about it. “Touch not the Lord’s anointed” becomes no longer a prophecy of Christ but of the leader who invokes it. That’s what turns a heresy into a cult.

Blend these three ingredients––with a generous dose of hucksterism, self-promotion, and personality cult—and it’s not surprising that we have the cult of Christian Trumpism. Though it has nothing to do with serious politics or serious Christianity, it’s the culmination of many decades of exploiting both. And the end result is a dangerous enthusiasm that opposes both.


Michael Horton is the J. Gresham Machen professor of systematic theology and apologetics at Westminster Seminary California. His books include Putting Amazing Back into Grace, Christless Christianity, and The Gospel-Driven Life.

27 February 2016

Cults, Families and some personal reflections


I watched the NBC Today Show exposé they title #Uncovered on their Friday 19 February. The story featured a woman and her parents and the Korean church titled "World Mission Society Church of God." The founder, a woman, claims to be the incarnate God, born in 1948. The church claims on their 'welcome' page to be "the only true church which God has established on this earth. (Acts 20.28)"

On their introduction page, they say "In 1948 the Second Coming Christ Ahnsahnghong restored the truth of life. The Church of God started as Christ Ahnsahnghong came to Korea." What is the reader to understand? That The church which Paul references in Acts 20 actually existed then, but not again (where did it go?) until 1948 in Korea when a woman was born and became the 2nd coming of Jesus. Wow, what hyperbole, what a leap, what narishkeit!

But the story caught my attention for another and personal reason. You see, after I came to faith in Yeshua in 1971, my family was at a loss what to say, what to do, how to win me back to rabbinic Judaism. My father had already thrown me out of the family home because I had announced "Jesus is our messiah." But sometime that summer, two Jewish men showed up at my apartment in Kansas City. One was from my past, a 20-something rabbi who had some influence on me in my earlier teens. Their purpose was to stop my new faith, to call me back to their understanding of Judaism, and to restore our family. I wasn't really sure what to tell them. If I had that chance again, if I could rewrite history, I would have asked the two to tell my family that I love them, and wish we could all have good time again together. But I cannot play "Back to the Future" so I have to live with whatever weak responses I actually gave.

Over the decade of the 1970s we had our ups and downs in family relationship. My parents couldn't bear to attend my wedding in 1977, even though it was held only a few blocks from their home. But after our son was born in 1979, they welcomed us back into their fold. Until I told them we were joining the organisation "Jews for Jesus." The last decades before they passed some years ago, we were in very good relationship. Or at least better.

So when I watched the Today Show episode, I was sad for the parents and sad for the adult daughter who seemed at odds, but when "I love them" came out of the daughter's mouth, something was different. The firm, staunch supporter and representative of the heretical group WMSCOG actually expressed a sadness, almost cry-like statement, and it touched my heart. I think that the main problem with so many of these religions is the dissolution of family. And although there is a verse or two about making right choices in this regard, most of the time, God's love is about the harmony of families.

I remember when I told my dad that I loved my mom as much as I loved the prostitute on 39th Street. He heard it the other way around. He heard me saying that I didn't love my mother in a special way at all, and that my love for her was as limited as it was for a hooker on the streets. What I was actually saying was that because of Jesus and His dying for us on the cross, that God demonstrated His own love for us (all!) and thus we should love everyone equally, the lowly and the high, the family and the non-family. I was actually elevating the love I had for my mother and saying that I could extend grace, kindness, and real compassionate love even to the seriously lost.

But it didn't go down well, to say the least.

Over the decades I've discovered that family love IS different and that I think about my own wife and kids much more than other people's wives and children. I pray for them more than others. I hope for their lives to be full of life and full of blessing. And no matter what else might happen between us, or in their choices of partners or religions or job or homeland, they are still family. And that's thicker than anything else. So I get what upset my dad. And I am sorry I caused him stress that day. And hopeful that my own family, sister, aunts, cousins, children...etc...all find eternity with God the most blessed estate. But even if they don't agree with me... we are still mishpochah. And #familymatters. (For some unpacking by opponents of the movement, see this Website )

My Op-Ed to the Sydney morning Herald

  The Jews, Yeshua, and the Language   Christians Must Reject Bob Mendelsohn | Sydney I opened Saturday’s newspaper and was confronted by th...