04 May 2026

Lesson 7 of 12. "Deeper Truths" On the blind man and the Pharisees, even a missing word!

 Jesus Heals the Blind Man (Lesson 7 of 12)


Deeper Truths

Given on Zoom

April 2026

 

 

Tonight we continue our series of studies inspired by the culture study by Kenneth Bailey entitled Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes. Tonight we finish the fourth section, on the Dramatic Actions of Jesus. Thank you for letting me come to your world, on zoom and to speak to you this evening not only about Jesus healing a blind man, but also what happens with Jewish people not only in those days but in our day as well. You know that some Jewish people even this week came to faith in Jesus and this chapter, this scene, will help us help them with what's going to happen to them. (If you are reading this before May 30, 2026, you may join us live on Zoom Singapore 8 pm, Thursday. Just write me on email or phone me or WhatsApp, and let’s get you in the live teaching and Question time)

So, as we look deeply into one of the most significant Dramatic Actions of Jesus, from John chapter 9, we are going to be amazed how fitting this study is for anyone interested in Jewish life and story in our day. Let’s dig in, verse-by-verse.


John 9, Verse one: “As he was passing by, he saw a man blind from birth.” We so often skip the narrative sections in the Bible. I’m guilty of it for sure. I do that in ordinary books, like novels. We want to get to the action point, the conversations, but look at this. You see, the blind man did not see Jesus. but Jesus saw the blind man. If God sees, he'll see to it, and if he sees to it, the blind man's going to be taken care of. That’s great.


Verse 2: But right away the disciples asked Jesus a weird question. “Rabbi, who sinned this man or his parents?” Who thinks in those terms? Do you think in those terms? You see a blind guy, and you think--I wonder who sinned? Do you think that way honestly? No, of course not. But rabbinic teaching in those days said that if you were blind or had any other cause of disqualification for going into the holy temple, then there must have been a sin involved.

Deuteronomy 28.28 spells that out clearly. The curse is there due to failure by Israel, which is otherwise titled ‘sin.’ So, it’s fair to conclude that somebody had to sin or else the blind guy would not be blind. Jesus surprised the disciples by saying in verse 3, “neither!” Wait a minute! This is not really something you’d hear at Bible college. Neither person sinned? Obviously, they both sinned. All people sin. (Ecclesiastes 7.20, Romans 3.23) Thus, both the parents and the son have sinned. What he’s saying is basically, “you’re missing it. The cause is not so clear. This blindness is not caused by sins… but that the works of God would be displayed. We are going to work the works of God while it’s still light. I am the light of the world.”


To demonstrate his bringing light to the world, he spits on the ground. Now you know this could not take place in Singapore! OK, he spits on the ground and he makes mud. Now that is weird. Sometimes to heal someone Jesus said,” stretch out your hand” (Luke 6.10) or to the lame man “Pick up your bed” (Matthew 9.6) or to another he said, “your sins are forgiven.” (Mark 2.5) But spit on the ground and make mud?


We’ll get back to that in a bit. Why did he spit and make clay and stick it on the guy’s face.  I mean who else but a blind man is going to let you put mud in his face?  In verse 7 Jesus tells the blind man to “go and wash in the Pool of Siloam.” Some of you have been to Israel and you know Jerusalem. It’s on the top of a hill, and the ancients built footpaths and sidewalks, but bannisters and safety and health regulations—those didn’t exist.

Yeshua sends the blind man with mud in his face down to the bottom of Jerusalem to the pool of Siloam. I’ve walked through that. It is cold flowing water from Mount Hermon. Have you ever seen blind people walk, especially in unfamiliar locations? They don’t walk like you and I do. They are tentative, and they’re holding on and they’re not sure. Caution is wise.


There were no perfectly rectangular steps. If you’ve been in any ancient place, you know that water has eroded the steps so here, he is he’s walking down and he gets to the pool and he splashes and washes and he comes back seeing. Fantastic! 

How do sighted people walk? Standing up they’re different in their walk than blind people. No wonder when he came back seeing, verse 8 his neighbors and those who previously saw him as a beggar wondered if it’s that the guy that used to lie there. Is that he? They wondered because he didn’t look the same.


I’m guessing most people didn’t really notice him or know him anyway. Some others said yeah, it’s he. Others said, “no I don’t know” He looks like—they weren’t sure—because he walked differently, he was different. They kept asking who are you? He said in verse 9, Yes that’s me. I’m the guy. they said Wait a minute-- how’d this happen? And that’s a reasonable question. How did this happen?


Verse 10. They ask for his testimony. Now, he’d never been to a testimony class. He told his story in bullet points. 1) The man who’s called Jesus made clay, 2) he put it in my face and anointed my eyes then 3) he said go and wash, so 4) I washed and 5) I came back seeing. Simple, right?


Verse 12: They said, “Where is he? The man answered, “I don’t know.” Jesus could have been standing right there, but he’d never seen him before, so he didn’t know who he was or what color robe he was wearing. ‘I don’t know’ could have been the end of the story. It was a great story. Jesus heals blind guy-- pictures at 11. I mean that would have been an awesome newscast, but the story goes on.


Verse 13 “They brought to the Pharisees the man who was formerly blind.” Now you might read that as they were dobbing him in. But that’s not how I read this. They simply had a religious question like you might have. Perhaps you have experienced something like this. Wait a minute-- somebody was dying of covid and now he’s walking around and he’s healthy. Or somebody ran into a train in Bras Basah station and now they’re up and walking. How does that happen? You might have that same question, so what do you do? 


You take them to the religious leadership. That’s why we pay pastors. They are supposed to know this stuff. So, they brought him to the Pharisees. Verse 14 is not a throwaway. There’s narrative again. “It was the Sabbath day when Jesus made the clay.”  Why does that matter? Because you’re not allowed to heal on the Sabbath. Now if Jesus walked by this guy on Saturday and healed him, wouldn’t you imagine Jesus could have walked by the guy on Friday and healed him or Tuesday? Of course. 


Why didn’t he use another day? I believe he chose Sabbath because he’s a stirrer. There’s a Yiddish phrase, af tselochas, just to stir, just to spite. He’s doing this to help them all see that they were not in charge of the Sabbath-- that he was. I’m glad John put the day of the week in there. Because if it was a Tuesday nobody would have cared that he healed anybody, but it’s Saturday he heals—trouble!


Verse 15 the “Pharisees were asking him again how he had received his sight?”  The blind man shortened it for them because religious people need it shorter than regular people! His bullet points 1) he applied to clay to my eyes 2) I washed and 3) I see. Just three bullet points. Some of the Pharisees were saying well, “this man is not from God.” They chose not to say his name. His name was significant from the very beginning. The angel named him “Yeshua” for he would save his people from their sins. Yeshua is the Hebrew word from yasha meaning “to save!”

Gabriel called his name Saviour because he’s going to save. Now he didn’t tell Mary and Joseph to call his name melamed because he’s going to be a teacher. Don’t call his name navi because he’s going to be a prophet though he taught and prophesied. The angel said to call his name Yeshua because he’s going to save. That’s his gig; that’s why he came. They said in verse 16 this “man is not from God.” When I got saved in 1971, I went home and I told my mom and dad that Jesus was the Messiah. They threw me out of the house.

I remember 20 years later trying to witness to my grandmother again in the Jewish old folks’ home. She had her wits about her; her body was decaying. And she lived five more years, but I remember previously talking about Jesus to her and she said, “Don’t talk to me about that man.” She couldn’t say the name Jesus; it had brought too much trouble in our family. 


But that one day in October of 1991, Grandma Bessie invited me to share with her about God and Jesus and that day she prayed to receive the Lord. In fact, I offered to lead her in a prayer. She agreed. I went right for it. 

“Dear Jesus, thank you for your love…” She repeated it and the rest is eternal history. 

The Pharisees said, “This man is not from God because he doesn’t keep the Sabbath.” Now this raises a huge question tonight. Let me ask you-- friends, did Jesus keep the Sabbath or no, he did not?


This has serious implications. Don’t be quick to answer. If he did not keep the Sabbath, he’s a law breaker, and if he’s a law breaker, he cannot be your Saviour. Did he keep the Sabbath? Your theological answer is yes. So how did he do what he did and not break the Sabbath? Again, Yeshua is teaching that they were getting it all wrong. He was teaching them that healing is not against the Sabbath at all. There’s not a single Bible verse that says you may not heal on the Sabbath, but by custom they taught that this was out-of-bounds. Yeshua was saying, “No, this is not out of bounds at all.”


For instance, the rabbis prohibited certain remedies on the Sabbath. (Mishnah Shabbat 14:4) Why? The concern was that a person like a doctor treating illness might lead someone to grind herbs, which is classified as work. (Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 53b)

So, the rule developed: If a matter is life-threatening, then heal immediately. If there is a minor condition, then healing should wait until after Sabbath.

The Bible never forbids healing on the Sabbath. The debate was never about God’s law—but about how far mercy was allowed to go.


Verse 16 continues “others were saying how can a man who’s a sinner perform such signs” and as such, “a division arose among them.” Dear friends there is still a division among the Jewish people about Jesus. That’s true whether here in Nashville or back in Sydney, across Australia or Asia, in Israel and Johannesburg, there is still a division because of Jesus. You walk over to a Jewish friend’s place or to a Jewish dentist and explain to them that Jesus is the savior. Maybe someone there will like it or someone there won’t like it; there’s a division.

Verse 17: “They said to the blind man, what do you say about him since he opened your eyes?” Now in our version we read his answer as a declarative with a full stop, but I wonder if he didn’t answer with a question mark. I imagine him thinking this. “Hmm, who is he? I don’t know; let’s see-- you guys walked by me for decades and you left me lying there. He came along and healed me. What’s the category? Let’s see, you’re a scribe or elder, so he’s above that. What would that be called?  Is he a prophet?”


He’d never been to Moore College or Dallas Seminary. He didn’t know what the theological truth was. All he knew was that he once was blind and now he can see. 

Do you know that there’s a word missing in each of these scenes? There’s a word missing in this whole text? It’s the word Hallelujah. Listen, if God does stuff, we ought to shout it. So, the neighbors ought to have shouted.

Think about it. Our blind guy neighbor is healed. Hallelujah! they should have shouted.  The Pharisees to whom they brought him should have shouted, “Wow, God has done stuff –hallelujah! Amen!”


Verse 18 “The Jews did not believe it of him that he’d been blind and had received sight until they subpoenaed his parents.” And they question them asking, “Is this your son? who you say was born blind? That can’t be—How does he now see?” They asked him three questions and his parents said, “Yes, we know he’s our boy. Yes, we know he was born blind” But number three-- we don’t know how it happened. He’s old enough; ask him.”

What should his parents have said? Hallelujah! Praise the Lord!
For me personally, I’ve got three adult kids, and I’ve got six grandsons and one beautiful granddaughter. I’d give my right kidney; I’d give my life for my kids to have a better life. I would give anything for them to have a better life and you who are parents-- wouldn’t you do the same as well? Of course!


These are parents of a blind man. Come on, shout hallelujah! Instead, they say, “he’s old enough. Ask him; he’ll speak for himself.” Verse 22: “This his parents said because they were afraid of the Jewish leadership because they’d already agreed that if anyone confessed Jesus to be the Messiah, he’d be put out of synagogue.”

That’s why his parents said that. Listen, the day I got saved, I got put out; I got removed from synagogue. I understand the cost. But I did not pay a cost as high as others. For instance, if one of you does something way out of bounds in church and then it was brought to the elders, and the elders said, “We better get this guy out of church,” what would happen? If you wanted to keep going to a church and living wrong, you’d simply go down the street to another church and it’s likely they would never investigate. They would likely welcome you and invite you to the home group. 


But it’s not so easy in the Jewish world. Let’s say you get kicked out of synagogue. Let me give you a very real example. I’ll call this man Sammy. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.  There are 500,000 Jews in Brooklyn. He works every day in the garment district over in Manhattan; he’s a tailor. As an ultra-Orthodox Jew, he rides a bus, not a city bus because then he might touch a gentile, no he rides a special private bus that picks up ultra-orthodox jews from there in his neighborhood and takes them to the garment district on the west side of Manhattan. 

He works all day; at midday he takes some time out to bring his lunch to a study center where a group of orthodox Jewish men (no women) would gather and study the Talmud (the Jewish interpretation book of the Bible.) At the end of his long shift, he would get back on the bus and ride back to his home where he would eat, perhaps with his 10 children.


Through a series of miracles, Sammy and one of our missionaries met and studied the Bible, and Sammy gave his life to Jesus. He was living in utter fear that if they found out that he believed in Yeshua, he would be put out of synagogue. What would that mean to Sammy?  It means that he would not be able to ride the bus to go to work. It means he would have no more work; it means he would have no more socialization. It means that he would have to figure out a new job. He was 47 years old and that’s all he’d ever done in life. What’s he going to do next week? And it means that his 10 children including his daughters would not be able to be married. Why, you might wonder? It’s because in that subgroup of Jewish people, the normal is for marriages to be arranged. If he’s tainted with his Christianity then his daughter must be tainted as well, so she would now lose. He’s affecting really infecting his whole family. that’s what it means to be put out of synagogue. It’s all his lives: social, economic, political, every which way you’re put out. I’ll tell you at last report, that Sammy is still doing well in the Lord and overcoming that fear day by day.

Verse 24: a “second time they called the man who’d been blind and they said give glory to God we know this man (again unnamed) is a sinner.” Friends, they’d already decided that so why did they even have a pseudo-investigation? The Pharisees had already made up their mind so any inquiry that they made was useless. All they were looking for was their pre-conceived answer.

That bolstered their negative view already. “Give glory to God” -- not to this man. That’s what they’re saying. We know this man’s a sinner. He answered, “I don’t know very much at all because you guys don’t teach me because blind guys and women and eunuchs were not allowed to go to learning centers. I don’t know very much” he said this, but I do know this, the words of Amazing Grace are real to me. “I once was blind but now I see.” They said, “Come on, what did he do to you? What was the trick? What was the magic that he threw on you sprinkled dust or some incantation from India? How did he open your eyes?” He said, “I told you already. Why do you want to hear it again? You want to become his disciples too?” This is such a Jewish lawyer thinking. I love this. What do you want to know because they don’t want to know-- they’re looking for a reason to disbelieve. 


He didn’t give it to them, and then they said, “you’re his disciple; we are disciples of Moses.” You’re learning from the wrong professor; you’re in the wrong seminary. “We know that God has spoken to Moses but as for this man (third time) we don’t even know where he is from.” What does that mean? They knew where he was from geographically, but they didn’t know his yichus, that is, his family background. The argument to this day is who is the father of Jesus? We don’t know his genealogy-- that’s what they’re saying. The story by the rabbis then. and to this day, is that a Roman soldier raped Mary, and the subsequent birth of Jesus took place. 


“We don’t even know where he’s from” the man answered, “well that’s amazing. you don’t know where he’s from but he’s the one who fixed me.” In other words, you people don’t have all the answers. ‘Have a nice day’ is what I’m hearing him say. We know that God doesn’t hear sinners, but if anyone is God-fearing and does his will, he hears him and then…” so he’s teaching them. He’s teaching the boys and so no wonder they interrupt and say in verse 34 “you were born entirely in sin —steeped in sin.” Now who says that kind of thing? Only rabbis who are convinced that if you are blind, there is a cause and that’s somebody’s sin. You were steeped in sin, I know that because you’re blind. “How dare you lecture us and they threw him out.” Verse 34. Dear friends, they’d already thrown him out, hadn’t they? They’d already called him out and said you’re steeped in sin; you can’t come to our seminary; you can’t come to our Bible class; you are not us (even though he was entirely us) and that could be the end of the story.


But the stories continue. Verse 35 “Yeshua heard that they’d put him out and finding him he said.” Don’t skip that; don’t skip narrative! What did that say “Yeshua heard that they threw him out.” Yeshua didn’t just heal the guy and go take a taxi and go to another town. Yeshua was right there sticking around for the story-- the unfolding of the story. He heard that they’d put him out and finding him. How do you find something? You search for it. Yeshua was looking for him. We don’t know if it was that day or another day, but we know he searches, he seeks. What does the Bible say “the son of man has come to seek and save that which was lost” (Luke 19.10) and Jesus said to the man, “Do you believe in the son of man” that is, in the messiah. Verse 36, he said, “Who is he that I might believe?”


You might have a different take on this than I do, but this is when I get upset at Jesus. This is when I want Jesus to say, “Here’s my business card. I’m the son of man; I’m the savior of the world; here’s my card you can now read that.” I’d like him to do that but no he does this weird thing. Verse 37, “you have both seen him and he is the one talking with you.” What? Just say “Yes, that’s me.” I would love that. Why he did the same thing with his cousin. Remember John the Baptist was in jail, and he sends Jesus a note and says, “are you the one to come or do we look for another?” (Matthew 11.1-6) That’s when Jesus should say something like “yes, John, I am,” that’s all he had to say. John would have gotten it. But no, he writes back to John and says tell him that “the blind see and the lame walk and the deaf hear.” John is asking a straight question, and I want Jesus to give a straight answer—that’s not that hard. Look what Jesus is doing, in his answer, he’s calling several witnesses to testify the lame are walking, the blind are seeing. He’s answering from Jewish hopefulness, in fulfillment of Isaiah chapter 35. That chapter says when the messiah comes these are the kinds of things that are going to happen.  Jesus is not saying “Johnny, trust me like a used car salesman.” He’s not saying, “John pull up the bootstraps come on man you were there at the beginning keep going let’s keep going in a religious commitment.” He’s saying, “let the witnesses speak.”.

 

Now back to our story in John 9. Here he tells the formerly blind guy you’ve both seen him and you have heard him. That’s it! Do you remember my voice? This is the one speaking with you. I’m the one who said to you, “Go wash in the pool of Siloam.” Two testifiers right there. 1) that you are seeing and 2) I’m the one speaking and then he falls on his knees we figure, and he said, “Lord, I believe.” Wow that’s so great that could be the end of the story, but it’s not.

The final touch puts it all in perspective and demonstrates another biblical device. It’s also used in novels and poetry. It’s an inclusio. An inclusio is when a passage starts and ends with matching language or themes to highlight the main point. Think of it like parenthesis or brackets. Verse 39, Yeshua said, “For judgment I came into this world so those who don’t see may see and those who do see may become blind.” That’s confusing, isn’t it?

The next verses help us.


Verse 40 “the Pharisees who were with him” Does that surprise you? Pharisees who were with Yeshua. These are not the enemies; these are not the people to whom the blind man was brought. These are some ordinary guys.

These are the Pharisees who want to know. The Pharisees who were with him heard these things and said to him is this blind thing about us? Are you including us in this? Yeshua answered them and said in verse 41, “if you were blind, you’d have no sin but since you say we see your sin remains.”

 I believe there are two kinds of people in the world. 1) sinners who admit that they’re sinners and 2) sinners who don’t admit that they’re sinners. Got it? Sinners who admit it and also sinners who don’t admit it.

Aren’t you glad you get to be a sinner who admits that you’re a sinner this morning? That’s what we do in church every time we sing about the blessed savior and his blood washing over us to cleanse us from our sin. We’re not saying, “I got this; I’m good; we’re good. I’m trying to walk. I’m righteous. I’m doing all right.”

No, rather we’re sinners who admit we are sinners. When you do that you can be healed and see and if you don’t admit that, then your blindness remains.


That’s what Yeshua is teaching. It’s a long story. It’s a great story. It happened at the end of chapters seven and eight. I know this sounds obvious, but John is not usually mixing his story. He’s not usually so concerned about a linear presentation of the life and death of the actions of Yeshua. He’s like a scrapbook collector. He’s not interested in keeping everything in chronological order. He’s an old guy when he’s writing this, and he’s remembering things in groupings.


Structurally, why do I tell you that? Because in chapter 7 it’s the feast of Tabernacles that happens about every October in our calendar. In the feast of Tabernacles there are two major events that took place in the Jewish world in those days. They are 1) a great lighting ceremony that takes place atop Jerusalem right there at the temple where giant torches were lit, and they were able to be seen not only in the temple area but for miles all around. Remember that it’s on top of a hill; there are no city lights in those days.

Yeshua stood in front of those lights and said, “I’m the light of the world.” He even said that at the beginning of our passage today.

The other ceremony is recorded in John 7.37. It was on the last day of the feast when there was a big parade. Think Mardi Gras only with clothes on. Massive celebrations took place. Crowds. Priests. And the center point was the pool of Siloam at the bottom of Jerusalem. The priests would take 2) a large pitcher of water from there and go up to the top of the mount where the temple was. The high priest would pour out that water and the people would celebrate.

There are all kinds of reasons for that, but I want you to see that with that as a backdrop Yeshua said, “if anyone’s thirsty, let him come to me and drink and out of his belly will flow rivers of living water but this, he spoke of the spirit.” With those two tabernacle images in John 7 and John 8 John is chronicling those links in a beautiful way because those who were in darkness can see the light of life because of the torch above Jerusalem.

But he who came down on to Jerusalem from above and who brought the light of the world (himself) to the world, and he brought it through the pool of Siloam not so that people could have beverages, but that so that he who was blind could see. He changed darkness and brought a man to light.


Do you remember we left a question hanging before? Why did he make mud and stick it in the guy’s face? He knelt and spat, made mud and puts it right in the blind guy’s face. You see, the last time somebody from above came down, took dust of the earth and fashioned something out of the clay, that was God himself who made Adam and then made Eve and then put them in the Garden of Eden. What is Yeshua saying about himself? He could have healed him by saying “you’re healed” but he got down, right next to him, made mud, put it in his face and basically said, “I am creator; you can trust me; I’ve got this one.”


And the blind man trusted him and the inclusio was completed. Why was the man born blind? That the works of God would be demonstrated. And they were. On Sukkot!

Jesus wanted to show himself as God incarnate the light of the world and the water of life.

I regularly get to ask people who are not yet believing, if they could change anything or make a name for themselves. I find out they are blind, and then if they’re blind or needy or have sin, and if they say, “no, we’re good; we see”, then I get to tell them, like Jesus said, “if you were blind you would have no sin.” Do you see how he wraps it back into the sin question from the very beginning? Who sinned this man or his parents? If you admitted you were blind you’d have no sin, but since you say we see then you’re responsible and your sin remains.


Dramatic Actions Template:

1)    Reveals who He is (Messiah, God, Light of the World).

2)    Confronts hypocrisy and empty religion e.g. parents, some of the Pharisees.

3)    Visually communicates spiritual truth by opening eyes.

4)    Often echoes Old Testament prophetic symbolism as we saw in Isaiah 35 and 61.


FIVE TAKEAWAYS from our 7th lesson tonight:

1)    Don’t skip the narratives or the genealogies or the little markers in the Bible. They could be full of back story not to miss.

2)    When God sees, He will see to the situation. Our job as believers is to get him to see. That’s what prayer is all about.

3)    The word ‘hallelujah” is missing in this series of stories related to the Blind Man. Let us not miss our chance to shout his praise and proclaim the excellencies of him who called us out of darkness into his marvelous light.

4)    Yeshua’s dramatic action showed the world that he is The Light of the World, the Messiah, even God, the Creator, and we get to know him and be with him forever. He demonstrated it with the blind man. He will be dramatic in action with us!

5)    Don’t finish a story before the story is finished. Derek Prince used to say, “When you are looking for a miracle, keep plugged in until it is accomplished.” The blind man’s condition and healing is a testimony to all future seekers “who are with him” to admit our own sin and find sight. I once was blind; now I see.

 

24 April 2026

Lesson 8: Jesus and Women... getting it right...again


“Deeper Truths” Lesson 8 of 12

Based on Kenneth Bailey’s book

Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes

Given 23 April 2026

Via Zoom

By Bob Mendelsohn

 

 

Thank you for joining us tonight for our 8th lesson in this series. You have given me 2 months of listening and watching each week since the end of February and I don’t take that lightly. Some of you have recently joined us and I invite you to watch the previous lessons on my YouTube channel in the playlist entitled “Deeper Truths.” We have so far discussed in both the lecture part of the evening and in the Question time that immediately follows these topics: 1) The Lord’s Prayer, 2) The birth of Jesus, 3) The Beatitudes, 4) The Dramatic Actions of Jesus, and tonight we begin the penultimate section that Bailey titles “Jesus and Women.” We will cover this section in two sessions.


While Bailey zooms in on several women, I will make sure we look at others in the Bible as well. Think about the mutualism found in the Scripture, that is, Eve and Adam both in the Garden of Eden. Both removed. Then they try after the expulsion to have children, and Eve hopes that their first-born Cain would be the serpent-bruiser. 


Not only at the beginning of the Scripture, but at the beginning of the Gospels, we see women. Five of them (as we previously discussed in the Birth story of Matthew 1) including Mary, Mark includes Peter’s mother-in-law in chapter 1 of his biography who is healed and immediately gets up to serve the disciples. Luke showcases Elizabeth and Mary, each more noble in a fashion than their husbands in his chapter 1, and John waits to chapter 2 to highlight Mary and the miracle at Cana.


We might note that the Church began at Pentecost as recorded in Acts chapter 2 and that Peter the apostle mentions more than once that men and women are included in the supernatural actions of the Lord. More on that later.

Bailey has often brought to our attention throughout this book the back-and-forth inclusions of women stories and men stories, and we ought not miss those references again. 


Our author chooses for us to study—all unnamed: The Woman at the well (John 4), the Syrophoenician woman (Mark chapter 7), the woman caught in adultery (John 8), and the sinful forgiven woman at the house of Simon the Pharisee (Luke 7). He finishes the Women section with two parables. One, the woman and the Judge (Luke 18) and the wise and foolish young women or virgins (Matt. 25). We will deal with only two of those women tonight. Be patient, we will get to all of them by end of next week. 


Each of the four unnamed women had heard about Jesus before they met him in person. What they heard influenced what they believed and what they wanted from him. You know that the apostle Paul wrote the famous, “Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God.” (Romans 10.17). Faith is the key we find that opens the door to God’s love and peace, for each who employs this faith of the Son of God (Gal. 2.20-21) John the apostle wrote, “Faith is the victory” (1 John 5.4). What is it to believe, anyway? Is it a description of a mental ascent? Is it a checklist of ideas that we agree with?  Not even close. Faith is surrender to the God who has called us out of darkness. Faith is letting God be God and you be you. It’s admitting who is who in the equation of religion. It means I trust God, I confide in God, and in his Son the Lord Jesus Christ, to make his way known to me and to those near me. 


Each of these women will exemplify these ideas of faith, and even the women in the parables that will follow as well. 

With that as an introduction, let us be sure about our own faith and the calling God has on us, on our women friends and relatives and all those whom we know. It is a gift, after all, and a fruit of the same Spirit. Fruit grows and is not relegated to a back shelf in the world of religion. It is the evidence of a heart toward God. (Hebrews 11.1)

I’m feeling led to speak more about faith just now. The Hebrew root of the word ‘faith’ (Emunah) is the word we say at the end of prayers. ‘Amen.’ Amen is often simply translated as “so be it.’ Basically, it means, “What you said just now, that prayer you offered… I agree with this and hope it happens soon.” In other words, “Amen” means “I agree.” 

Now it’s hard to agree with something some people say and it’s almost impossible to disagree with yourself. In light of the spiritual gift of the speaking in tongues, Paul wrote, “For otherwise, if you bless God in the spirit only, how will the one who occupies the place of the outsider know to say the “Amen” at your giving of thanks, since he does not understand what you are saying?” (1 Corinthians 14.16) If you speak in another language than the one in which the meeting is being conducted and a novice or unbeliever comes in, how can they say, “I agree” with any honesty? That’s a very good point. 


Of course, Paul answers that conundrum with the ‘interpretation of tongues’ where he says, “Therefore let one who speaks in a tongue pray that he may interpret.” (1 Cor. 14.13)

The whole point of the tongues with or without interpretation is for faith to grow in unbelievers and for the people of God to be edified. Faith is the key and saying, “I agree” makes someone else’s prayer your prayer. It makes others’ faith to be your faith. Faith is not isolated; it’s communal. 

Those are some of my thoughts tonight; I’m sure we can speak more about that after the teaching section or down the proverbial road. 

Back to women…


The Older Testament and Women

One of the things about which I’m clear is that everything I know about God in the Older Testament is found in Jesus. He is the image of the invisible God (Col. 1.15) If you have been following me on YouTube lately you will know that I have produced 10 shorts that have been ringing this subject, “Exodus 34 and Jesus—same God, two Testaments.” He’s the Lord, Lord God, compassionate and merciful, abounding in lovingkindness and truth.”


I tell you that to remind us all that if God were to suddenly change his manner or his tune or his belief system, that would be off putting. After all, he says, “I the Lord do not change.” (Malachi 3.6) In fact, if he were to change, then the 2nd half of that verse would be out-of-kilt. For he says, “therefore you, o sons of Jacob, are not consumed.” Based on God’s immutable character, Israel continues to survive. That’s a comfort to me and all Jewish people I know.

Now as of tonight, I’m going to begin a new 10-part shorts series on Jesus and women in the Bible and challenge the mindset of opponents who think that the Scriptures keep women in a 2nd class, subservient category and thus they reject its hypotheses. 


Women in those days, but not in Bible!

However, Bailey makes it clear that Jesus is different, not to the biblical picture of women, but to the Jewish displacement of them. His use of Ben Sirach quotations is outrageous, isn’t it? Listen to what Bailey quotes: “A deterioration seems to have taken place in the intertestamental period, as seen in the writings of Ben Sirach. The aristocratic scholar of Jerusalem, who lived and wrote in the early 2nd century BC. For him, women could be good wives and mothers and are to be respected, but if you don't like your wife, don't trust her. (7:26). Be careful to keep records of the supplies you issue to her. (4:26-7). Deed no property to her during your lifetime, and do not let her support you. (33:20, 25:22-26). Women are responsible for sin coming into the world, and their spite is unbearable. (25:13-26). Daughters are a disaster. Indeed, to Ben Sirach, a daughter was a total loss and a constant potential source of shame. (7:24-29, 22:3-5, 26:9-12, 42:9-11). There is no discussion of women, apart from their relationship to men, and Ben Sirach's list of heroes of faith records only males. (44-50). A low point is reached when Ben Sirach writes, “do not sit down with the women, for moth comes out of clothes, and a woman's spite out of a woman. A man's spite is preferable to a woman's kindness. Women give rise to shame and reproach.” (42:12-14).” (page 307)


The first Jew for Jesus: The Virgin Mary

Before we dig into at least two of the women in his quartet, let me highlight Miriam, the mother of Yeshua. Mother Mary. The Virgin Mary. The teenager from Nazareth who one fateful day receives an angelic visitor, Gabriel, and their conversation and her subsequent “Song of Mary” fill a chapter in the Bible. (Luke 2). She is at that point engaged to a man named Joseph. They are both from the line of King David. Mary’s song sounds a lot like Hannah’s song (1 Samuel 1) with gratitude and boasting in the Lord as major themes. Both women had other children after this firstborn. Hannah had 5 more children. Mary had at least 6. 


We already covered the genealogical issues of Mary in the lesson on the Birth of Jesus. (https://bob-mendelsohn.blogspot.com/2026/03/lesson-3-of-12-on-birth-of-jesus.html) And there we saw the 5 women listed in Matthew chapter 1. Mary is the capstone of them all and I believe each of the Gospel writers made her symbolic of all that is good in women. 


Yeshua admonished John to look after her while Yeshua was dying on the cross. (John 19.26-27) Yeshua calling her “woman” in the wedding miracle at Cana (John 2.4) is not a derogatory as we might hear in the Bronx, no, it was endearing. 


No matter whether you are a staunch Catholic or a vehement anti-Catholic, we all must admit that the first Jew for Jesus was this young teenager named Miriam. She was engaged but had no sexual relations with Joseph. He found out that she was pregnant and wanted to divorce her in secret to prevent her shame and his. We know the stories of the day about her pregnancy would have been seriously shameful. No one can recover from civic shame, think of the fallen pastor in Singapore or Dallas Texas, the government official in [name any country], and the person who disappointed you in your earlier life. Shame sticks. 


That could have been her destiny, but the angel had plans; Miriam and Joseph stuck to those plans and to the Lord, and a virgin had a baby. The story began in a miracle, acceptable by the mother of the miracle baby.  And that acceptance like of Hannah on the announcement of her Samuel, makes those ladies stand outs of faith. 

In fact, no fewer than 4 women are listed in the Hall of Faith (Hebrews 11) and that is no mean amount. Sarah (.11), Rahab the harlot (.31), the women who received their dead by resurrection (widow of Zarephath (1 Kings 1) and Shunamite mother (2 King 4).


The record of the Older Testament in relation to women is replete with significant women who break the societal norms that Ben Sirach championed. Deborah, Ruth, Esther, my goodness, Esther, queen of 127 provinces of the Persian empire. Oy, could we use her now in Iran, amen?


The Samaritan Woman at the Well (John 4)

Back to Bailey’s quartet. First, the unnamed Samaritan Woman at the well. In John 4, Jesus’ encounter with the Samaritan woman at the well is one of the longest recorded conversations Jesus has with any individual. Bailey emphasizes that this is not casual dialogue—it is a serious theological exchange. In a Middle Eastern context, several barriers are crossed: she is a woman, a Samaritan, and someone with a complicated personal history. Yet Jesus initiates the conversation.


“Give me a drink.” Now that could be rude, but she’s brought her bucket and a dipper. He doesn’t have one. He’s simply asking for assistance. That’s reasonable. But her response is ‘hey, you shouldn’t be talking to me.” It’s about social convention. He’s breaking the rules.


Bailey notes that in that culture, public interaction between an unrelated man and woman—especially a Jewish ‘rabbi’ and a Samaritan—would be avoided. But Jesus not only speaks to her; He engages her mind. He discusses living water, worship, and the nature of God. She responds intelligently, asks questions, and even raises theological debate about the proper location of worship. Jesus treats her as capable of understanding deep spiritual truth.

He tells her she should ask him and he would give her living water. She replies, “You don’t have a bucket.” She’s saying, this guy doesn’t know the social rules, and he doesn’t know the water gathering rules. He’s from some other place, but he’s not from around here.


I’m impressed with the way Jesus painted her into a corner, and she had no way out except to say, “Messiah will tell us everything.” Meaning, basically, ‘stay out of my life.’ 


He had told her about her five husbands. 

He had told her about the man she was with during these days. 

He told her enough that she knew that he could tell her everything about her life. He hadn’t been reading the newspaper to uncover information about her. He wasn’t from nearby. He didn’t know social rules, water rules, Jewish rules… who is this guy?


Importantly, the disciples’ reaction shows how unusual this is—they are surprised to find Him speaking with her, yet they say nothing. That silence, Bailey suggests, reflects both their discomfort and Jesus’ quiet authority.

The woman then becomes a messenger to her village. Bailey highlights that in a culture where her social standing would have been low, Jesus entrusts her with witness. She brings others to Him, and many believe because of her testimony. In fact, the whole town comes out to hear him and say, “we believe…we heard it for ourselves.”

Think about that. She’s the social outcast, gathering water in the heat of the day. She’s avoiding all social contact. Women collected water in the early morning or late afternoon. But this woman wanted to be alone. Yeshua interacted with her at just the right time. 


She ran into town, leaving her watering jug. She approached ‘the men, and said, ‘come see a man who told me everything I ever did.” (John 4.29). And they listened. And they went and found out. Her witness was heard. Her person was validated. She was brought back into their sphere. 

Bailey’s key point is that Jesus restores dignity without grand gestures or public protest. He simply treats her as a responsible theological thinker and credible witness. In doing so, He demonstrates that women are not only recipients of truth but also participants in proclaiming it.


The Woman caught in adultery (John 8)

The next woman we will unpack tonight is the unnamed woman caught in adultery. (John 8).

This text is not found in all the oldest manuscripts and Bailey makes the point that this was no doubt an oral story that someone wrote into the text in later decades and eventually its gloss is in our text today. I’m ok with that rendering, also.


This story is rightly placed immediately after the Sukkot story about which we spoke last week that culminates in the healing of the blind man after attending to the pool of Siloam. Yeshua is going to demonstrate that what he says he will do. If you are thirsty, come to me and drink. 

In the story with the Samaritan woman at the well, he’s assuring her that he will supply water that is alive. Here he said that (John 7.37ff) in public on the top of the mount named Zion, as the last vestige of water was drained from Siloam. If God didn’t send rain as soon as possible, during the Rainy Season, then the land would parch and the people would have no crops in months to come. Again, he’s the God who provides water in a dry and weary land where there is no water. (Ps.63.1)


Some gentlemen laid a trap as Bailey observes to catch Jesus in either a diminishing of the Torah or an unsympathetic situation with an adulteress. Of note, of course, is that the adulterer is nowhere to be found. Or was he right there all along? We aren’t told. 

We see the woman cowering in fear for her life in front of the holy man. She knows the punishment; she teased herself that this wouldn’t be brought to trial. She was wrong. 


They say to Jesus, “we caught this woman, in the very act.” What to do? Jesus stoops and writes on the ground. Is he stalling? He used his finger, not a stick or a stone. Just his own finger. 

Jesus’ response is deliberately indirect. He stoops and writes on the ground—an action Bailey interprets as a way of defusing the public tension. Rather than immediately engaging the accusers, Jesus lowers Himself, shifts the emotional temperature, and refuses to play by their rules of escalation. When He finally speaks, he reframes the issue from legal technicality to moral accountability.


They persisted, “so he straightened up,” and raised the bar. He said, “he who is without sin, let him cast the first stone.” (John 8.7) Nowhere in the Torah do we read that the executioners had to be holy.

Bailey approaches John 8 as a classic Honor–shame confrontation staged in a public, male-dominated setting. The woman is dragged into the temple courts—likely surrounded by a crowd—by religious leaders who are not primarily interested in justice but in trapping Jesus. Bailey notes the obvious: the Law requires both parties, yet only the woman is produced, exposing the situation as manipulated and unjust from the start.


In a Middle Eastern context, public shaming is powerful and often irreversible as we mentioned with the Virgin Mary. This woman stands exposed, silent, and defenceless. Bailey emphasizes that her silence is culturally appropriate—she cannot argue her case in that setting. The men, by contrast, control the narrative and expect Jesus to validate their authority.


In Bible days the Talmud teaches us, the two witnesses to a crime, who brought the information about the guilt of the accused, must stand behind their story. How? They are the ones who will push the guilty into (in the case of stoning) a rock pit and be the first to toss the opening rocks into the make-shift quarry and begin the execution. Other rules I remember have to do with the height of the platform where all three would stand until the two push the guilty one off. The platform had to be doubled the height of the accused. In falling onto the rocks below, the man’s neck would usually break and death would be immediate, they hoped. 


Jesus elevates the holiness required by the witnesses and executioners. In fact, knowing what we know about Yeshua now, he was the only one who could have cast the first stone. He was the only one without sin. Bailey highlights the gradual withdrawal of the accusers, beginning with the oldest ones. This orderly exit preserves their honour while simultaneously dismantling their case. Jesus does not humiliate them; He allows them a way out. And why did the old ones leave first, dropping their stones?


They knew their own guilt. They had been accused. That’s why Jesus was writing in the sand. 

Read with me these two OT texts and you will see what I mean.

“When He had finished speaking with him upon Mount Sinai, He gave Moses the two tablets of the testimony, tablets of stone, written by the finger of God.” (Exodus 31.18)


The 2nd text is found in Jeremiah chapter 17. You won’t want to miss this. I’m reading from the KJV. 

“O LORD, the hope of Israel, all that forsake thee shall be ashamed, and they that depart from me shall be written in the earth, because they have forsaken the LORD, the fountain of living waters.” (17.13)


I believe that Yeshua was writing with his finger the sins perhaps in column 1 and the names of the sinners, perhaps in column 2. Menachem, coveting. Reuven ben Eliyahu, adultery. Etc. The old ones saw their sin and knew, like the woman at the well that he could tell them everything they had ever done. They dropped their rocks. The gig was up. But not complete.


Left alone with the woman, Jesus restores her dignity. His question, “Where are they? Does no one condemn you?” invites her to speak for the first time. She says, “no one, Lord.” Then He declares, “Neither do I condemn you; go, and sin no more.” Bailey stresses that this is not permissiveness. It is grace paired with moral clarity.

She is not forgiven, in a technical sense. Why not? Because there is no court. There are no continuing accusers. The courtroom is empty. Properly this is forensic forgiveness. And full of moral clarity.

In this encounter, Jesus protects the vulnerable, exposes injustice, and restores honour—without inciting public chaos. For Bailey, it is a masterful example of how Jesus upholds both compassion and righteousness within the realities of Middle Eastern culture.


And how he showcases another woman, another unnamed woman, as better than her accusers, a manipulated woman, used by her male counterparts for their physical and moral superiority manoeuvring, but in the end, she wins. And Yeshua gets the glory. 

Next week we will delve into the Syrophoenician woman and the sinner attending to Yeshua in the house of Simon the Pharisee as we keep marching through the book on Jewish culture, Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes.


My takeaways tonight:

1)     Be sure your sins will find you out (Num. 32.23)

2)     Jesus never diminished Torah, he elevated it.

3)     Mary’s Magnificat and Hannah’s petition BEFORE they had their baby are signs of faith and deep confidence in the Lord of life

4)     When Jesus backs you into a corner it’s for your good and his glory.  The sooner you submit, the better for everyone.

5)     The first people to announce the Messiah were women. First the Samaritan here, and later Mary and the other women at the tomb, including Magdalena who went and told the brothers “He is risen” God can and will use you, dear sisters, to proclaim his Good News.

 

 

 

Lesson 7 of 12. "Deeper Truths" On the blind man and the Pharisees, even a missing word!

  Jesus Heals the Blind Man (Lesson 7 of 12) Deeper Truths Given on Zoom April 2026     Tonight we continue our series of studies inspired b...